Latest articles from "Progress in Physics":

Progress in Physics: 10 Years in Print(January 1, 2015)

Structures of Superdeforemed States in Nuclei with A ~ 60 Using Two-Parameter Collective Model(January 1, 2015)

Astrophysical Clock and Manned Mission to Mars(January 1, 2015)

Bio-Precursors of Earthquakes and Their Possible Mechanism(January 1, 2015)

The Strong and Weak Forces and their Relationship to the Dirac Particles and the Vacuum State(January 1, 2015)

Lorentzian Type Force on a Charge at Rest. Part II(January 1, 2015)

Gauge Freedom and Relativity: A Unified Treatment of Electromagnetism, Gravity and the Dirac Field(January 1, 2015)

Other interesting articles:

What Caused Airline Deregulation: Economists or Economics?
The Independent Review (January 1, 2015)

CYTOGENETIC STUDIES OF CHROMOSOMES OF YAK
Journal of Cell and Tissue Research (December 1, 2014)

Researching Palmistry in England
Femspec (July 1, 2014)

Vigilancia ambiental de casos esporádicos de legionelosis en el municipio de Córdoba (España), 2005-2010
Observatorio Medioambiental (January 1, 2014)

Methods to Minimize Optical Noise That Degrade Fluorescence Efficiency of Optical Probe for Near-Infrared Tracking in Surgical Environment
Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering (January 1, 2015)

L'interminabile parola data. Intervista di Damiano Sinfonico a Milo De Angelis
Cuadernos de Filología Italiana (January 1, 2014)

Il gufo Graziadio e Uccelli di Saba: la temporalità ne L'orologio di Carlo Levi/The Owl Graziadio and Saba's Uccelli: the Construction of Time in L'orologio by Carlo Levi
Cuadernos de Filología Italiana (January 1, 2014)

Publication: Progress in Physics
Author: Wagener, Pieter Cornelius
Date published: October 1, 2010
Language: English
PMID: 97941
ISSN: 15555534
Journal code: PGPY

(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)

1 Introduction

In previous papers [1-5] we showed that a Lagrangian

... (1)

where

m^sub 0^ = gravitational rest mass of a test body moving at velocity v in the vicinity of a massive, centralbody of mass M,

γ = ...,

R = 2GM /c^sup 2^ is the Schwarzschild radius of the central body.

gives rise to the following conservation equations:

E = mc^sup 2^e^sup R^/r = total energy = constant , (2)

L = e^sup R/r^M, (3)

L = magnitude of L = constant, (4)

L^sub z^ = ..., (5)

= z component of L = constant,

where

m = ..., (6)

is a variable gravitational mass and

M = (r × m^sub 0^v), (7)

is the total angular momentum of the test body. Eqs. (3) and (4) are amendments to the equations in the previous articles.

The above equations give rise to equations of motion that satisfy all tests for present gravitational phenomena.

2 Gravitational repulsion

Eq. (2) shows that gravitational repulsion occurs between bodies when their masses m are increased by converting radiation energy into mass. This conversion occurs according to the photoelectric effect,

... (8)

This is the reverse of what occurs during nuclear fission.

In a previous paper [4, §3] we proposed that this accounts for the start of the Big Bang as well as the accelerating expansion of the universe. We now consider other effects.

2.1 Black holes

With black holes the reverse of repulsion occurs. According to (2) and (6) matter is converted into radiation energy (v [arrow right] c) as r [arrow right] O. Conversely, as radiation is converted into mass, matter should be expelled from a black hole. This phenomenon has been observed [6].

In this regard our model of a black hole differs from that of general relativity (GR) in that our model does not approach a mathematical singularity as r [arrow right] 0, whereas GR does approach one as r [arrow right] R.

2.2 Pair production

...

Fig. 1: A high-energy gamma ray passing near matter can create an electron-positron pair.

In pair production a gamma ray converts into a positron and an electron, with both particles moving away from one another. Pair production only occurs in the presence of a heavy mass. The explanation for the required presence of the mass is generally given in texts as:

The process as we have assumed it to occur is impossible. This is because energy and momentum cannot simultaneously be conserved in free space in this process. . . .

However, if the high-energy gamma ray passes near a very heavy particle, then the heavy particle can soak up all the momentum without carrying away a significant amount of energy [7, §5.6].

We aver that the explanation is contrived. The last sentence is too inexact for a rigorous mathematical formulation. Although we do not submit a formulation at this stage, we suggest that repulsion occurs between the particles and the heavy mass.

2.3 Laboratory demonstration

It should be possible to demonstrate gravitational repulsion in a laboratory. A suggestion on how to do this is provided by Jennison and Drinkwater [8], Their experiment was not designed to demonstrate gravitational repulsion, but to demonstrate how the properties of mass, or inertia, are simulated by phase-locked standing waves in a microwave transmitter/receiver system mounted on a frictionless air track. It should be possible to modify their experiment to show that gravitational repulsion would occur if the frequencies of the standing waves were increased. As a prototype we propose a modification of their experimental setup as depicted in Fig. 2. Two microwave transmitters/receivers lock a standing wave of frequency v near a large mass M. Increasing the frequency of the standing wave should push it away from M.

From (2) and (8) an increase of Δv will cause a separation of the microwave system from M equal to

..., (9)

where A, B are constants.

The repulsive effect can also be measured by a sensitive gravimeter placed between M and the standing wave system.

Setting up the above experiment could be cumbersome on a macro scale. The author is investigating demonstrating the repulsive effect at nano scales.

3 Conclusion

The success of the proposed theory to explain present gravitational phenomena supports the above proposal to demonstrate gravitational repulsion.

Submitted on April 28, 2010 / Accepted on May 17, 2010

References

1. Wagener P.C. Aclassical model of gravitation. Progress in Physics, v.3, 2008, 21-23.

2. Wagener P.C. A unified theory of interaction: gravitation and electrodynamics. Progress in Physics, v.4, 2008, 3-9.

3. Wagener P.C. A unified theory of interaction: gravitation, electrodynamics and the strong force. Progress in Physics, v. 1, 2009, 33-35.

4. Wagener PC. Experimental verification of a classical model of gravitation. Progress in Physics, v.3, 2009, 24-26.

5. Wagener PC. From inspired guess to physical theory: finding a theory of gravitation. Progress in Physics, v.l, 2010, 11-14.

6. ElbazD.,Jahnke K., PantinE.,LeBorgneD. and Letawe G. Quasar induced galaxy formation: a new paradigm? Astronomy & Astrophysics, V.507, 2009, 1359-1374.

7. Ashby N. and Miller S.C. Principles of Modem Physics. Holden-Day, 1970.

8. Jennison R.C. and Drinkwater AJ. An approach to the understanding of inertia from the physics of the experimental method. J. Phys. A. Math. Gen., v. 10, 1977, 167-179.

Author affiliation:

Pieter Cornelius Wagener

Department of Physics, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa

E-mail: Pieter. Wagener@nmmu.ac.za



The use of this website is subject to the following Terms of Use