Author: Villarruel, G R; Langley, G E; Oberste, M S; Pallansch, M
Date published: December 10, 2010
Journal code: IMMW
Enteroviruses, members of the Picornaviridae family, are common viruses associated with clinical manifestations ranging from mild respiratory symptoms to serious conditions, including aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, neonatal sepsis, and acute flaccid paralysis. Approximately 100 serotypes of nonpolio enteroviruses have been recognized (/), and some viruses previously classified as enteroviruses, namely echovirus 22 and 23, recently have been reclassified as human parechoviruses (HPeVs), a different genus within the Picornaviridae 'family. This report describes trends in nonpolio enterovirus and HPeV detections during 2006-2008, based on data from two laboratory-based surveillance systems, the National Enterovirus Surveillance System (NESS) and, for the first time, the National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS). As in previous years, approximately 70% of detections occurred during July- October, the peak enterovirus season. The five most common enterovirus serotypes (coxsackievirus Bl [CVBl], echovirus 6, echovirus 9, echovirus 18, and coxsackievirus A9) accounted for 54% of total serotyped detections. During 2006-2008, southern states reported the most serotyped enterovirus detections, followed by midwestern states, western states, and the northeastern states. In 2007 and 2008, CVB 1 was the predominant serotype detected, accounting for 24% and 19% of overall detections, respectively. In 2007, CVBl was implicated in an outbreak of serious neonatal infections in the United States (2). Understanding trends in enterovirus and HPeV circulation can help clinicians decide when to test for these infections. Also, more timely reporting of data could help public health officials recognize outbreaks associated with these viruses.
NESS, initiated in 1961, is a passive, voluntary surveillance system that monitors laboratory detections of enteroviruses in the United States. Participating laboratories are encouraged to report enterovirus detections by serotype, specimen type, collection date, age of patient, and sex of patient to CDC monthly. Enterovirus serotyping is performed by sequencing the genome region encoding the VP 1 capsid protein by immunofluorescence using typespecific monoclonal antibodies, or by neutralization with type-specific polyclonal antisera.
NREVSS is a passive, voluntary, laboratory-based surveillance system that tracks temporal and geographic trends in the circulation of respiratory and enteric pathogens. NREVSS began collecting enterovirus reports in July 2007· It collects the number of enterovirus tests and the proportion that are positive, by specimen site and collection date; no serotyping, demographic data, or clinical data are reported. All participating laboratories that reported at least one enterovirus-positive specimen were included in this analysis. Enteroviruses were detected by cell culture or nucleic acid detection (polymerase chain reaction).
During 2006-2008, enterovirus and HPeV detections were reported from 49 states through one or both of these surveillance systems during the years specified (Figure 1). A total of 20 laboratories (including 18 public health laboratories, one private reference laboratory, and CDCs Picornavirus Laboratory) reported results to NESS. Public health and private laboratories without the capacity to serotype send specimens to CDC Picornavirus Laboratory for serotyping. A total of 1,632 enterovirus or HPeV detections were reported to NESS during this period (920 from public health laboratories, 661 from the one reference laboratory, and 5 1 from CDCs Picornavirus Laboratory). Of these detections, 1,103 (68%) were reported during July- October. The age of patients for whom age was known (1,415 [87%]) ranged from < 1 month to 79 years, with a mean age of 9 years and a median age of 2 years. Children aged < 1 year accounted for 660 (47%) of these 1,415 enterovirus or HPeV detections for which the age of patient was known. Cerebral spinal fluid was the most common source for detections, accounting for 743 (51%) of the 1,468 reports of known specimen type, followed by 324 (22%) detections from throat-nasopharyngeal specimens, 268 (17%) from stool-rectal swabs, and 133 (10%) from tissue specimens.
Enterovirus or HPeV serotypes were specified for 1,171 (72%) NESS reports. By region,* southern states had the most serotyped detections reported, accounting for 418 of 1,167 (36%) reports for which state information was provided, followed by 373 (32%) detections from midwestern states, 222 (19%) from western states, and 154 (13%) from northeastern states. The five most common enterovirus serotypes accounted for 54% of total detections with a known serotype in 2006-2008 (Table). Overall, during 2006-2008, CVBl was the most commonly detected enterovirus identified in 235 (17%) of 1,171 specimens tested (Table). In 2007, CVBl was detected in 22 mostly southern and western states; two states reported 70 (51%) of 137 detections. In 2008, CVBl was detected in 10 states; one state reported 15 (34%) of 44 detections. During 2006-2008, three public health laboratories and CDCs Picornavirus Laboratory reported a total of 21 HPeV type 1 (HPeVl) detections. HPeVl was one of the 1 5 most common enteroviruses reported during the surveillance period but was detected in <2% of specimens (Table). During the surveillance period, only 14 cases of enterovirus 71 (EV71), a virus that has caused widespread outbreaks of hand, foot, and mouth disease in several Asian countries (3), were reported to NESS, and it was not included as one of the 15 most common serotypes reported.
DuringJuly2007-December2008,atotalof3,192 (3%) of the 108,798 reports sent to NREVSS were positive for enterovirus. One hundred laboratories reported testing for enteroviruses to NREVSS. During this period, the highest proportion of detections was reported during July- October (Figure 2). The proportion of enterovirus-positive specimens was similar across regions.
The findings in this report are consistent with previous trends regarding the most commonly detected enterovirus serotypes (4). During 2006-2008, CVB 1 became the predominant enterovirus serotype identified, found in several states, and concentrated in a few. Common clinical presentations of CVB 1 include aseptic meningitis, myocarditis, pleurodynia, and hand, foot, and mouth disease. CVB 1 generally shows an epidemic pattern of circulation with irregular intervals of increased circulation usually lasting 2-3 years (4). During 1970-2005, CVBl accounted for approximately 2% of reports with known serotype, with an increase of CVB 1 observed in the early 1990s and then again in the early 2000s (4). In 2007, increased detections of CVBl reported to NESS led to an investigation that identified severe neonatal disease and deaths associated with CVB 1 infection in multiple states (2,5).
Since 1997, EV71 has caused widespread outbreaks of hand, foot, and mouth disease in several Asian countries (3). A small proportion of cases have resulted in encephalitis and death. In the United States, small clusters of serious disease were detected during 2003-2005 (6). Although there was an increase in reported EV71 detections in the United States during 2006-2008, EV71 detections were uncommon.
HPeVl usually has been associated with mild gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms, meningitis, and neonatal sepsis (7). HPeVl was one of the 15 most common detections during 2006-2008; no other HPeV types were reported during that period. HPeV cannot be detected by EV-specific assays. CDCs Picornavirus Laboratory has performed the majority of HPeV typing reported to NESS but has worked with clinical and state laboratories to enhance their HPeV diagnostic and molecular typing assays (8) to improve detections and enhance parechovirus surveillance.
The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, enteroviral infections other than poliovirus infections are not nationally notifiable in the United States. NESS is a passive system that relies on voluntary participation from laboratories, so findings are not necessarily representative of national or regional enterovirus activity. Although there might be more reports emanating from one state or region, it might not represent an increased burden of disease in that state or region. Second, the findings are limited by the lack of clinical information; however, most detections likely represent serious disease because cerebral spinal fluid was the most common source of detection. Third, most testing is performed during the summer months; circulation during other parts of the year might go undetected. Finally, although monthly NESS reporting is encouraged, not all participating laboratories submit timely data, which can delay accurate reporting.
NESS could be improved with more regular reporting by current laboratories and by increasing the number of participating laboratories. NREVSS provides enterovirus activity over a wider geographic area because more laboratories participate in the system, but it does not provide serotype or demographic information. The combined systems provide the best available data on enterovirus circulation in the United States.
Since July 2009, a simplified, Internet-based NESS system has allowed participating laboratories to easily input enterovirus detection data and to analyze national and state-based trends in enterovirus surveillance, by serotype. Additional information about this system is available by e-mail (firstname.lastname@example.org).
The findings in this report are based, in part, on contributions by staffmembers of participating NREVSS laboratories and state virology laboratories reporting to NESS.
* Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin; Northeast: Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York; South: Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Tennessee; West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington.
1. Pallansch MA, Roos RP. Enteroviruses: polioviruses, coxsackieviruses, echoviruses, and newer enteroviruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, Griffin DE, et al, eds. Fields Virology, 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins; 2001:723-75.
2. CDC. Increased detections and severe neonatal disease associated with coxsackievirus Bl infection - United States, 2007. MMWR 2008;57:553-6.
3. CDC. Deaths among children during an outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease - Taiwan, Republic of China, AprilJuly 1998. MMWR 1998;47:629-32.
4. CDC. Enterovirus surveillance - United States, 1970-2005. MMWR 2006 ;5 5 (No. SS-08).
5. Wikswo ME, Khetsuriani N, Fowlkes AL, et al. Increased activity of coxsackievirus B 1 strains associated with severe disease among young infants in the United States, 2007-2008. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:e44-51.
6. Perez- Velez CM, Anderson MS, Robinson CC, et al. Outbreak of neurologic enterovirus type 71 disease: a diagnostic challenge. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:9507.
7. Harvala H, Wolthers KC, Simmonds P Parechoviruses in children: understanding a new infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2010;23:224-30.
8. Nix WA, Maher K, Johansson ES, et al. Detection of all known parechoviruses by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:2519-24.
GR Villarruel, MPH, GE Langley, MD, MS Oberste, PhD, MPallansch, PhD, Div ofViral Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, CDC.