The Lieberman Legacy: Building or Burning Bridges?

ANALYSIS.






Latest articles from "Jewish Exponent":

An Emptying Chamber (November 8, 2012)

STARS OF DAVID (November 8, 2012)

He's in the Army, His Weapons Are Words (November 8, 2012)

Sandy Stories: Destruction, Recovery and Human Kindness (November 8, 2012)

EXIT POLLS: Obama Garnered 69-70 Percent of Jewish Vote (November 8, 2012)

There's Lots to Be Proud of, but Major Challenges Still Exist (November 8, 2012)

Correction (November 8, 2012)

Other interesting articles:

The Dalai Lama's War
The National Interest (September 1, 2011)

Swarm Logic and the Science of Social Networks
Journal of Singing (September 1, 2011)

Sidestepping the Strait
Middle East (April 1, 2012)

hope SPRINGS ETERNAL
Empire (August 1, 2011)

The "Greater Truth" Defense
American Journalism Review (April 1, 2012)

Mighty Upheaval on the Minnesota Frontier: Violence, War, and Death in Dakota and Missionary Christianity
Church History (March 1, 2011)

Get Rid of Kathryn Olson
The Stranger (September 26, 2012)

Publication: Jewish Exponent
Author: Kampeas, Ron
Date published: January 27, 2011

WASHINGTON

Joe Lieberman ascended to national prominence by building one bridge at a time. Then, having reached the pinnacle by becoming the Democratic nominee for vice president in 2000, he spent 10 years burning bridges.

Ultimately, Lieberman's most celebrated bridge - between America's non-Christian, nonestablishment minorities and the highest office of the land - will be his legacy, according to both friends and critics.

The U.S. senator from Connecticut, perhaps the nation's bestknown independent, announced last week that he would not be running for re-election in 2012.

In an anxious appearance in Hartford - he began by likening himself to TV personality Regis Philbin, who'd also announced his retirement - Lieberman's first serious reference was to his role as a history maker.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

"I can't help but also think about my four grandparents and the journey they traveled more than a century ago," he said.

"Even they could not have dreamed that their grandson would end up a United States senator and, incidentally, a barrier-breaking candidate for vice president," he added.

"First Jewish candidate on a major ticket" would be the Lieberman legacy to outlast all others, said Ira Forman, former director of the National Jewish Democratic Council.

"It was an electric moment," he recalled of Al Gore's choice of Lieberman in 2000.

Lieberman, an Orthodox Jew, had come to that point through a reputation of independence, but also one of reconciling the seemingly irreconcilable.

In 1998, he delivered a floor speech excoriating President Bill Clinton for his affair with Monica Lewinsky He called his one-time friend "immoral," and said that Clinton had "weakened" the presidency.

The speech sent out shockwaves but it was also credited with salvaging the presidency when the Senate rejected the U.S. House of Representatives' impeachment. Through a Democrat's excoriation of a Democratic president, Lieberman seemed to have punished Clinton enough.

BREAKING WITH THE RANKS

Lieberman's reputation for outreach defined his career in the Senate since he arrived in the body in 1989, having been elected after serving as Connecticut's attorney general. His breaking with Democrats in backing the first Persian Gulf war in 1991 helped him later in the decade, when he rallied Republicans to support Clinton's military actions in Kosovo.

In 1992, when Clinton's campaign was cold-shouldering Arab- Americans, the community reached out to Lieberman, despite pronounced differences with him over Israeli-Palestinian issues, because of his reputation for fairness.

James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute, tells of Lieberman's outrage, and how after one phone call, Clinton's headquarters in Little Rock, Ark., opened its offices to Arabs.

Yet it was as he ran for vice president that signs emerged of how the next decade would play out. He delivered an ineffective performance in his debate with Dick Cheney, George W. Bush's running mate. And during the recount, he undercut one of Gore's best arguments - questionable absentee ballots from the military - when he told NBC's "Meet the Press" that they should be honored.

The real turning point came after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, when the Bush administration launched a political and diplomatic campaign to make the case for war against Iraq.

Like many other Democrats, Lieberman backed war. But while many of his colleagues came to regret their decision, he stuck by it, and made it the centerpiece of his 2004 campaign for the presidency. He was bitter when Gore, who opposed the war, endorsed Howard Dean for president.

Lieberman's adamant backing of the war led to an insurgency in Connecticut. Liberal Democrats descended on the state to back his anti-war opponent, Ned Lamont, helping him win the primary.

Establishment Democrats, including a freshman senator from Illinois named Barack Obama, supported Lieberman in the primary, but could not see a way to support him once Lamont prevailed. Lieberman ran as an independent, and with the Republican Party refusing to back its candidate, he won with votes from the GOP and independents.

In that election, Jewish Democrats were torn between their loyalty to the party and to Lieberman. Notably, the National Jewish Democratic Council stayed out of the fight.

That loyalty helped Lieberman capture a fourth term and highlighted his ties to the Democratic Party.

But that bridge burned when he made it clear that he'd back his friend Sen. John McCain (RAriz.), the GOP candidate, in the 2008 election. Lieberman's announcement led to a tense, whispered conversation with Obama on the Senate floor, in which Obama reminded Lieberman of how he had made time to campaign for him against Lamont.

Particularly galling for Democrats was Lieberman's agreement to endorse McCain on the floor of the Republican National Convention in Minneapolis. McCain even considered Lieberman as a possible running mate.

"He put himself in a position where his longtime supporters, particularly the hard-core Democrats who had supported him over the years, could no longer defend him," said Marvin Lender, who raised money for Lieberman in 2006. "I say that recognizing he was a very loyal person to his old friend, but he crossed over a line when he did that and disappointed a ton of people."

After the election, Obama made it clear that he wanted Lieberman on his side. That meant that Lieberman maintain his chairmanship of the Homeland Security committee while caucusing with Democrats.

He still had a bridge or two to burn: On health care reform - a signature issue for Jewish Democrats - Lieberman equivocated until the last minute, ultimately casting his vote in favor.

His relationship with Obama was cordial, but tense. Lieberman took the lead in criticizing Obama's approach to IsraeliPalestinian relations as confrontational when Obama met last May with Jewish lawmakers.

Lieberman maintained his fierce independence until the end. His career cap was a nod to his more liberal sensibilities, when in the final weeks of 2010, he earned kudos from liberals for enabling repeal in the Senate of the "don't ask, don't tell" rule that had made it impossible for gays to serve openly in the military. Gay activists did not fail to notice that Lieberman, a Sabbath observer, stuck out the vote, even though it was on Shabbat.

Yet that also was a bridgeburner of sorts. When Lieberman a few nights later attended a Republican Jewish Coalition party celebrating the GOP's win of the U.S. House of Representatives, at least one GOP donor to Lieberman's 2006 campaign buttonholed him and said he would never again give him money because of his success in leading the "don't ask" repeal. Lieberman smiled, said he had to do what he had to do and left the party.

"Sen. Lieberman is a true mensch and a great American," the RJC said in a statement Jan. 19. "He showed that it's possible to have a successful political career while doing what you feel is right - even when what's right is not what's in your political best interests."

Author affiliation:

RON KAMPEAS

Jewish Telegraphic Agency

The use of this website is subject to the following Terms of Use