Author: Shapouri, Reza
Date published: April 1, 2011
Brucella is the causative agent of brucellosis, one of the most important and widespread zoonoses world's [I]. All of the main species of farm animals are susceptible to brucellosis. As a zoonotic disease virtually human infections derive from direct or indirect exposure to animals [2,3]. Brucella spp. are Gram-negative facultative intracellular bacteria and the major site of residence of the Brucella in both the natural hosts and humans is the macrophage. After entry into the host, they are taken up by macrophages and display a remarkable resistance to be killed by these phagocytes [3,4]. Indeed the capacity of these bacteria to maintain long-term residence within macrophages serves as the basis for their ability to establish and maintain chronic infection.
In numerous experiments, cell culture of macrophages of a variety of hosts including cattle, humans and mice has been use to show a correlation between the ability of Brucella to resist the activity of phagocytes by virulence [4-6]. In human, brucellosis is a chronic, debilitating febrile illness that can last for months and is characteristically difficult to treat with antimicrobial agents. Typically prolonged treatment (four weeks or more) with two antibiotics is employed to treat human brucellosis. Even with the prolonged combined antibiotic therapy, relapses are not uncommon (5-10%) as well as no safe and effective vaccine exists for human brucellosis. To treat animal brucellosis which is similar to human brucellosis, multiple antibiotic regimens are used but generally these are not effective [1,7-1 1].
Hop (Humulus spp.), is a small genus of flowering plants native to temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere. The hop is part of the family Cannabaceae, which also includes the genera Cannabis (hemp), and Celtis (hackberries). The leaves are opposite, with a 7 to 12cm leafstalk and a heart-shaped, the edges are coarsely toothed. Male and female flowers of the hop plant develop on separate plants. The female flowers (often called "cones") of H. lupulus are known as hops, and are used as a culinary flavoring and stabilizer, especially in the brewing of beer, and grown in the absence of male plants. There are three species and H. lupulus var. lupulus isolate from Europe and western Asia .
The female inflorescences (hop cones or hops) rich in polyphenolic compounds and acylphloroglucides are widely used to preserve beer and to give it a characteristic taste and flavour [12,13]. Also hop cones have been used in medicine including for the treatment of sleeping disorders. The antimicrobial properties of hop are mainly due to the hops acids. They are shown antibacterial, antimycobacterial, antifungal, antiviral and antiparasitic activities [12,13]. Thus, the objective of the present study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of hops extracts against B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M in cell culture of mice macrophages.
Materials and methods
In this study we used of B. abortus 544, B. melitensis 16M strains obtained from the Department of Bacterial Vaccine and Antigen Production of institute Pasteur of Iran. Both strains are virulent for human and animals .
Preparation of hops extracts
The process of making hops extract normally involves drying and powdering the hops flowers or cones, then adding the powder (5Og) to solvent (500ml) (in this study water, ethanol and acetone) then combination is sealed and stored in a cool dark place. After 4h, the extracts were centrifuged and filtered, then extracts were collected and concentrated up to 10ml in vacuum pump at 40°C then concentrated extracts sterilized by 0.22µm filters and stored at -20°C until further use [15-17].
Antibacterial activity of hops extracts
On Mueller-Hinton (Merck, Germany) that supplemented with 1% of sheep Hb, 5mm diameter wells were prepared and then from 1.5×10^sup 8^cfu/ml of Brucella suspension cultivated on plates with sterile swab, then wells loading with hops extracts dilutions (70µl of 1:10 to 1:2560 dilutions). Plates incubated at the same conditions as mentioned above for three days and the zone of growth inhibition was measured. Finally residual activity of extracts was measured as a broth macrodilution method [18-22].
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration
Serial dilutions (1:10 to 1:2560) of hops extracts were prepared in Mueller-Hinton broth (Merck, Germany) supplemented with 1% of sheep blood. Then 5xl05cfu/ml of Brucella suspension was added to each tube and incubated at 37°C under 7-10% CO2 for five days, then the tubes were examined for turbidity, indicating growth of the microorganisms. The lowest concentration of the extracts that inhibits growth of the Brucella, as detected by lack of visual turbidity, is designated as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). For calculation of minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of extracts, after the MIC has been determined, 0.1ml of inoculums from each of the tubes of broth was sub-cultured on Mueller-Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) plates supplemented with 1% of sheep blood [14,18-21].
The number of colonies on agar after five days of incubation at the same conditions as mentioned is then counted and compared to the number of cfu/ml in the original inoculums. The lowest concentration of extracts that allowed less than 0.1% of the original inoculums to survive were determined as a MBC. Also the extracts were heated at 800C for 20, 40 and 60mins and residual activity was measured by the following method [14,1821].
Isolation of peritoneal macrophages
Thioglycollate-elicited peritoneal exudates cells were obtained from 6-8 weeks old female BALB/c mice following intraperitoneal injection of 1ml thioglycollate broth (4.05g/100 ml) (Difco, USA) and lavage of peritoneal cavity with 5ml of medium (RPMI 1640 with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS) four days later. The cells were washed twice and resuspended in RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS and placed in 96-well polystyrene micro titer plates at 0.27×10^sup 4^ macrophage per well. The plates were incubated for 2h at 37°C with 5% CO2, allowed adhering. Then the supernatant was aspirated and the adherent monolayer was washed three times with medium [2,4,23,24].
Treatment of peritoneal macrophages with hops extracts
Peritoneal exudate cells were counted for in vitro viability by dye exclusion test with trypan blue, before and 24h after incubation of macrophages with various dilutions of extracts (1:20 to 1:160) and normal saline was used as negative control [2,4,23,24].
Effect of hops extracts on intramacrophages Brucella spp.
Brucella abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M, were grown at 37°C in Brucella agar (Merck, Germany) under 7-10% CO2 for 48h, resuspended in phosphate-buffured saline (PBS), washed and resuspended in the same buffer. Bacterial numbers were determined by comparing the optical density at 600nm with a standard curve. Then bacterial suspension (5×10^sup 5^cfu/ml) was added to peritoneal macrophages and incubated for 2h at the same conditions as mentioned above, allowing the macrophages to ingestion the Brucella spp. [2,4,23,24]. Then, gentamicin at a concentration of 5µg/ml was added and micro plates incubated for Ih (at the same conditions) to kill extracellular bacteria. Then the monolayer was washed three times with media and various dilutions of hops extracts (1:40 to 1:320) were added. After 24h incubation Triton X-100 was used to lysis the macrophages. The number of CFU in laysates was determined by serial dilutions and plating on Brucella agar and normal saline was used as negative control [2,4,23,24].
Antibacterial activity of hops extracts
The agar-well diffusion method showed that B. abortus 544 was more sensitive than B. melitensis 16M to all of hops prepared extracts and all of extracts were shown inhibition zone further than 3mm between 1:10 to 1:320 of dilutions for both Brucella strains. Among prepared hops extracts, ethanolic extract was shown the most effective on inhibition of both Brucella strains and acetonic and aquatic extracts effectiveness were in subsequent ranks (Table 1). Similar to residual activity assay in broth macrodilution method, the same inhibition zone with unheated extracts was shown in agar-well diffusion method (see MIC and MBC section of results).
Determination of MIC and MBC
Results showed that MIC of aqueous hops extract for B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M was equal to 1:80 (0.625mg/ml) extract dilution and MBC was equal to 1 :40 (1.2mg/ml) extract dilution. Whereas MIC and MBC results of acetonic and ethanolic extracts for B. abortus and B. melitensis were the same and MIC was equal to 1:160 (0.05mg/ml) and MBC was equal to 1:80 (0.1mg/ml) extracts dilutions. Also results of residual activity at 80°C for 20, 40 and 60mins of each extracts showed similar results to the above mentioned broth macrodilution results.
Effect of hops extracts on macrophages
To determine the effect of hops extracts on viability of macrophages, murine peritoneal macrophages were treated in vitro with various dilutions of hops extracts for 24h. Viability of macrophages before and after incubation with dilutions of extracts were determined and expressed (Table 2). Results indicated that 1:10 and 1:20 dilutions of all extracts (4.8 and 2.4mg/ml for aqueous and 0.8 and 0.4mg/ml for ethanolic and acetonic extracts, respectively) had inhibitory effect on peritoneal macrophages while this effect was not seen by other dilutions of extracts. Therefore we can use 1:40 to 1:160 dilutions of hops extracts for studying their effects on intramacrophages Brucella strains.
Effect of hops extracts on intramacrophages Brucella strains
In order to assess the number of CFU of B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M in macrophage lysates for both treated and untreated macrophages, both lysate were cultured on Brucella agar. The results showed (Table 3) a significant decrease in the number of colony forming on the test plates comparing with control group. We also noticed that at the 1:40 and 1:80 (or 1.2 and 0.625mg/ml) for aqueous extract and 1:40, 1:80 and 1:160 (or 0.2, 0.1 and 0.05 mg/ml respectively) for acetonic and ethanolic extracts hops extracts dilutions cause complete elimination of intracellular Brucella spp. after 24h.
The inhibitory effect of hops aqueous, acetonic and ethanolic extracts shown on B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M were suitable in both broth macrodilution and agar-well diffusion methods, especially for alcoholic extract that showed the most inhibitory effect. Moreover, this antiBrucella activity of extracts was heat resistant and heating at 80°C up to 60min did not eliminate or reduce their antibacterial activity.
Other investigators showed antimicrobial effect of hops extracts on some bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus spp., Helicobacter pylori, toxigenic Clostridia, Lactobacillus spp., Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus spp., fungi, viruses and some protozoa [25-30]. It was also demonstrated that hops extracts exhibited antimicrobial activity when stored at 4, 10 and 25 0C and this activity was enhanced with increasing concentration and storage at the lower temperature of 4°C. Therefore, hops extracts can be used in food systems as a preservative. However, further studies are needed to show application in the food industry . In addition the most effective method of their application in food products, such as dipping, spraying or emulsification, needs to be investigated.
Macrophages are particularly important for the survival and spreading of Brucella spp. during brucellosis [4-6]. In this study, the effect of extracts dilutions on viability of macrophages was determined (Table 2) and these results indicated that MIC and MBC of hops extracts for Brucella spp. were not toxic for murine macrophages. Therefore, we used these dilutions for the treatment of intramacrophages Brucella spp. But, 1:10 and 1:20 dilutions of hops extracts were also toxic for macrophages and should not be used in macrophage culture.
Study of antimicrobial effect of hops extracts on intramacrophages bacteria and other microbes have not been carried out, as yet and this is for the first time we have shown that hops extracts have antimicrobial activity on intramacrophages Brucella spp., and MBC, MIC and 1:160 dilutions of all prepared extracts have significant effect on elimination of intramacrophage Brucella for a period of 24h (Table 3). Therefore, prepared hops extracts are able to penetrate into eukaryotic and immune system cells to kill the microbes in addition to their broth dilution and ager-well diffusion antimicrobial activity. Also they may be useful for the treatment of diseases caused by intracellular agents such as Brucella, that some useful antibiotic at laboratory was not effective in vivo.
Since there are several essential nutrients in hops extract, further experiments and complementary studies are needed. Significant amounts of the B vitamins, especially niacin, as well as potassium are present in the product. In addition, there are moderate amounts of calcium, magnesium, and vitamin C, as well as trace amounts of zinc and vitamin A  that showed that hops extracts had several useful effects.
In conclusion, the present study clearly shows that the aqueous, acetonic and ethanolic extracts of hops were effective on Brucella at laboratory and intramacrophage and therefore, they can be used to treat brucellosis. They can also be useful for food preservation.
This study was financially supported by Islamic Azad University, Zanjan-branch (Grant no: 88.31054).
1) Boschirol ML, Foulongne V, O'Callaghan D. Brucellosis: a worldwide zoonosis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001; 4: 58-64.
2) Olivera SC, Soeurt N, Splitter G. Molecular and cellular interactions between Brucella abortus antigens and host immune responses. Vet Microbiol. 2002; 90: 417-24.
3) Moreno E, Cloeckaert A, Moriyon I. Brucella evolution and taxonomy. Vet Microbiol. 2002; 90: 209-27.
4) Gorvel JP, Edgardo M. Brucella intracellular life: invasion to intracellular replication. Vet Microbiol. 2002; 90: 28197.
5) Jinkyung K, Splitter GA. Molecular hostpathogen interaction in brucellosis: current understanding and future approaches to vaccine development for mice and humans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003; 16: 65-78.
6) Rittig MG, Alvarez-Martinez MT, Porte F, Liautard JP, Rouot B. Intracellular survival of Brucella spp. in human monocytes involves conventional uptake but special phagosomes. Infect Immun. 2001; 69: 39954006.
7) Godfroid J, Kasbohrer A. Brucellosis in the European Union and Norway at the turn of the twenty-first century. Vet Microbiol. 2002; 90: 135-45.
8) Moreno E. Brucellosis in Central America. Vet Microbiol. 2002; 90: 31-8.
9) Refai M. Incidence and control of brucellosis in the Near East region. Vet Microbiol. 2002; 90: 81-110.
10) Ragan VE. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) brucellosis eradication program in the United States. Vet Microbiol. 2002; 90: 11-8.
11)Whatmore AM. Current understanding of the genetic diversity of Brucella, an expanding genus of zoonotic pathogens. Infect Genet Evol. 2009; 9: 1168-84.
12) Zanoli P, Zavatti M. Pharmacognostic and pharmacological profile of Humulus lupulus L.JEthnopharmacol. 2008; 116: 383-96.
13) Kac J, Plazar J, Mlinaric A, Zegura B, Lah TT, Filipic M. Antimutagenicity of hops (Humulus lupulus L.): bioassay-directed fractionation and isolation of xanthohumol. Phytomedicine. 2008; 15: 216-20.
14) Srinivasan D, Nathan S, Suresh T, Perumalsamy PL. Antimicrobial activity of certain Indian medicinal plants used in folkloric medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;74:217-20.
15)Stavri M, Schneider R, O'Donnell G, Lechner D, Bucar F, Gibbons S. The antimycobacterial components of hops Humulus lupulus) and their dereplication. Phytother Res. 2004; 18: 774-6.
16) Battacharya S, Virani S, Zavro M, Haas GJ. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans and other oral Streptococci by hop constituents. Econ Bot. 2003; 57: 118-25.
17) Nguyen-Pouplin J, Tran H, Tran H, et al. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of ethnopharmacologically selected medicinal plants from South Vietnam. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007; 109: 417-27.
18) Shapiro DS, Wong Jd. Brucella. In: Murray P, Baron E. (eds), Manual of clinical microbiology. ASM Press Pub, 1999; 625-31.
19) Maria-Pilar JB, Dudal Sh, Dornand J, Gross A. Cellular bioterrorism: how Brucella corrupts macrophage physiology to promote invasion and proliferation. Clin Immunol. 2005: 114:227-38.
20) Turkmani A, Psaroulaki A, Christidou A, et al. Uptake of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin by 2 Brucella strains and their fluoroquinolone-resistant variants under different conditions. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;59:447-51.
21) Iqbal A, Beg AZ. Antimicrobial and phytochemical studies on 45 Indian medicinal plants against multi-drug resistant human pathogens. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001; 74: 113-23.
22) Rios JL, Recio MC. Medicinal plants and antimicrobial activity. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005; 100: 80-4.
23) Pei J, Turse JE, Ficht TA. Evidence of Brucella abortus OPS dictating uptake and restricting NF-kB activation in murine macrophages. Microbes Inflect. 2008; 10: 582-90.
24) Sun YH, den Hartigh AB, de Lima Santos R, Adams LG, Tsolis RM. VirB-mediated survival of Brucella abortus in mice and macrophages is independent of a functional inducible nitric oxid synthase or NADPH oxidase in macrophages. Infect Immun. 2002; 70: 4826-32.
25) Haas GJ, Barsumian R. Antimicrobial activity of hop resins. J Food Prot. 1994; 57: 59-61.
26) Gerhauser C. Broad spectrum anti infective potential of xanthohumol from hop (Humulus lupulus L.) in comparison with activities of other hop constituents and xanthohumol metabolites. MoI Nutr Food Res. 2005;49:827-31.
27) Chadwick LR, Pauli GF, Farnsworth NR. The pharmacognosy of Humulus lupulus L. (hops) with an emphasis on estrogenic properties. Phytomedicine. 2006; 13: 11931.
28) Natarajan P, Katta S, Andrei I, Ambati VBR, Leonida M, Hass GJ. Positive antibacterial co-action between hop (Humulus lupulus) constituents and selected antibiotics. Phytomedicine. 2008; 15: 194201.
29) Yamaguchi N, Yamaguchi KS, Ono M. In vitro evaluation of antibacterial, anticollagenase, and antioxidant activities of hop components (Humulus lupulus) addressing acne vulgaris. Phytomedicine. 2009; 16: 369-76.
30) Buckwold VE, Wilson RJ, Nalca A, et al. Antiviral activity of hop constituents against a series of DNA and RNA viruses. Antiviral Res. 2004; 61: 57-62.
Reza Shapouri, PhD1*, Mehdi Rahnema, PhD 2
1 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic and Medical Science, Islamic Azad
University, Zanjan Branch, Zanjan, Iran
2 Department of Microbiology and Animal Biology, Faculty of Basic and Medical Science,
Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch, Zanjan, Iran
* Address for correspondence:
Dr. Reza Shapouri, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic and Medical Science, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch, Zanjan, Iran; Tel: +98241 4221030, Fax: +98241 4220030; Email: email@example.com