FOR-PROFITS UNDER THE MICROSCOPE






Latest articles from "Diverse Issues in Higher Education":

Here comes Brazil (November 8, 2012)

Native safety (November 8, 2012)

NAVIGATING THE ACADEMY (November 8, 2012)

A STUNNING ADMISSION (November 8, 2012)

Quote of Note (November 8, 2012)

Barbara Mink Succeeds John Roueche as CCLP Director (November 8, 2012)

FAMILY MATTERS (November 8, 2012)

Publication: Diverse Issues in Higher Education
Author: Davis, Crystal D
Date published: January 5, 2012

For-profit schools are getting away with fraud, leaving students thousands of dollars in debt because states are continuing to shirk their oversight duties, a recently released report has found. The report "State Inaction: Gaps in State Oversight of ForProfit Higher Education," by the National Consumer Law Center's Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project cites inflated job placement rates, grade manipulation and illegal recruitment practices as examples of the fraud that's flourishing in for-profit education. While the NCLC noted that while the federal government and some states have been cracking down on the schools, most others have lax oversight. The findings:

* Too many states have too many schools and too few regulators to police them. Some of the worst offenders include Washington (187 schools for every regulator), Wyoming (12 to 1) and Oklahoma (110 to 1)

* Too many education industry members sit on the oversight boards, creating a conflict of interest.

* Too many state regulatory agencies have too broad a mission, leaving them unable to ensure school quality and solvency.

Many states also wrongly see for-profit schools as the federal government's responsibility, the NCLC warned, and, thus, are unwilling to tighten regulation.

The use of this website is subject to the following Terms of Use